AI Fails the Creativity Test

Stable Diffusion Models Reveal a Persisting Human-AI Gap in Visual Creativity

While the article focuses on visual creativity and AI, it makes important points about other types of creativity and AI. In particular, the article states, "Nonetheless, points of criticism around computational creativity have also emerged, from GenAI's reliance on statistical recombination of training data in its creative process to, most importantly, the issue of prompt-dependency, arguably leading to a lack of true creative agency and intentionality in the models."

It is clear that AI generated works of art, literature, and music are derivative and mediocre works that are highly plagiarized. The way the large language models used by AI work prevent them from being creative. Using AI to make a work of art, literature, or music should not be a source of pride. Selling that work is ripping other people off.

Information

This post is a page of the Tidbits website.

Subscribe to the web feed to receive notifications when new posts appear. Use a feed reader to subscribe to the web feed. The web feed is a text file containing code written in the Atom syndication format.

Thunderbird can be used as a web feed reader.

Elfeed is a web feed reader for Emacs. Elfeed is available on MELPA as the package elfeed. Elfeed can be configured with an Org Mode file using the elfeed-org extension.

License

Author: Flower Snark
Email: flowersnark@gmail.com

Made with GNU Emacs and Org Mode.

Copyright © 2026 Flower Snark
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA 4.0).
CC BY-SA 4.0 summary
CC BY-SA 4.0 legal code

Page created on 2026-03-28T12:51:59-04:00.